نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اداری دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان
2 استاد مدیریت، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران.
3 دانشجوی دکترای حرفهای داروسازی، دانشکده داروسازی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی زابل، زابل، ایران
4 استادیارحقوق عمومی، دانشکده مدیریت و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه دریانوردی و علوم دریایی چابهار، چابهار، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Context and Purpose: The commercialization of medicinal plants requires the integration of indigenous knowledge, scientific research, and supportive policy frameworks; however, in Sistan and Baluchestan Province, this process has remained limited due to institutional fragmentation and weak coordination among universities, governmental bodies, and local markets. This study aims to examine the mechanisms of knowledge-based governance and the dynamics of innovation ecosystems in India, Turkey, and Morocco, and to propose a localized model for the Zahedan Science and Technology Park to strengthen the commercialization of medicinal plants.
Methodology: This applied, descriptive–analytical study adopts a qualitative comparative approach based on documentary and literature review. Data were collected from scientific publications, policy documents, and international reports (FAO, UNESCO, and WIPO) and analyzed across six dimensions: governance and institutions, biodiversity, innovation and technology, commercialization, resource sustainability, and stakeholder participation. A convergent–divergent comparative method was employed to identify similarities and differences and to extract transferable elements applicable to Zahedan’s innovation ecosystem.
Findings: The findings indicate that all three countries have coordinating institutions linking research, policy, and markets, although they differ in levels of institutional cohesion and policy implementation. India, through the National Medicinal Plants Board and a multi-level governance framework, demonstrates the highest degree of institutional integration. Turkey relies on university–cooperative collaboration and supportive regulatory frameworks, while Morocco applies a hybrid model combining indigenous and scientific knowledge, despite fragmented coordination. Across all cases, biodiversity and innovation pathways are strong, whereas the maturity of commercialization varies. Institutional cohesion, research–market linkages, and intellectual property regimes emerge as key factors in the successful commercialization of indigenous knowledge.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)